December 3, 2013 • 2:40 pm 0
Usual disclaimers apply. The USA will never construct a single mile of European style high speed rail. This is a well considered and intelligent article. It’s still just pissin’ in the wind, but follow the link anyway.
Filed under: Amtrak, International High Speed Rail, Passenger Rail Politics, Regional USA Passenger Rail, United States High Speed Rail
July 30, 2013 • 9:39 pm 0
California begins construction on a high speed rail line this summer in a project that has survived political battles and budget shortfalls. The rail will shuttle passengers between San Francisco and Los Angeles in three hours, with stops at various cities in between. This isn’t just the best current public works project in the United States because it will one day make the author’s life a lot easier, there are at least 5 big reasons:1. 20,000 jobs a year for the next 5 yearsThe high speed rail project will create 20,000 jobs a year over the next 5 years, according to Inhabitat. That is welcome news to cities like Fresno and Merced, where the first 65 miles of track will be built, which have unemployment rates of 13% and 15% respectively.
Filed under: Passenger Rail Politics, Passenger Rail Transportatio Policy, Regional USA Passenger Rail, United States High Speed Rail
July 23, 2013 • 2:02 pm 0
Evan Stair, the passenger rail supporter from Oklahoma, sent along some very encouraging analysis on the Illinois experience. He certainly hits one aspect of this battle for improved transportation straight on the bulls-eye. So far, the real beneficiaries have been the consultants and the numerous state functionaries who pretend to advance the interest of better rail passenger sail service. These people are generally predators and have no conscience about wasting the public’s money and misleading the populace. Another thing Stair hits, which is of extreme importance, is the necessity of walking before running. Put simply, if there were to be high speed trains in the United States (real 200mph European style operations), it would develop incrementally from successful passenger trains running in the conventional 110 mph range. The cost difference between the two types of construction is astounding. The Midwest High Speed Rail Association has an excellent conception of how this would work, but in the USA, where only highway and airline interests have a seat at the table, they have had limited impact.Anyway, here is the story and commentary from Mr. Stair.
This story shows how to develop conventional 79-mph – 100-mph passegner rail, leading to Regional 125-mph and Express 150-mph High-Speed Rail Services (per Federal Railroad Administration definition). Illinios is doing it right and in a similar fashion to the work done in Missouri.The Oklahoma, Kansas, and Texas DOTs are just creating the illusion they are passenger rail supportive by conducting study after study. The Oklahoma investment to get 79-mph rail service jump started between Oklahoma City and Sapulpa is $90 million according to the Tulsa Rail Advisory Committee (TRAC), $100 million to reach all the way to Tulsa.Illinois is learning to walk before it can run. Again, this is an example of how High Speed Rail is defined dramatically different in the United States.Evan StairPresidentPassenger Rail OklahomaPosted Jul 22, 2013 @ 10:22 PMLast update Jul 22, 2013 @ 10:43 PMHigh-speed rail construction is in its fourth season in Illinois with $1.45 billion in contracts awarded for projects ranging from track and signal upgrades to environmental studies.Work this year concentrates on sidings and design of the automated control system for faster passenger and freight trains, according to a summer 2013 update from the Illinois Department of Transportation. The goal is regular 110-mph Amtrak service on most of the St. Louis-Chicago corridor in 2015.“Expansion of 110-mph service to about two-thirds of the corridor is expected in the fourth quarter of 2015,” IDOT spokeswoman Jae Miller said in an email Monday. Amtrak started 110-mph speeds last fall on the northern end of the Lincoln Service route, between Dwight and Pontiac.The federal government has awarded Illinois about $1.45 billion toward upgrades between Chicago and St. Louis. Still more money is being sought, including for consolidation of Third and 10th street trains on 10th Street in Springfield.High-speed rail supporters also announced Monday separate funding would be sought to improve capacity at Union Station in Chicago. About half the cost of contracts awarded as of June 2013 have been for rail and structure upgrades, according to the IDOT update. Another $211 million is for new passenger cars and equipment, and $211.4 million for design, construction and other professional services.Miller said about $350 million actually has been spent to date on the rail work in Illinois. She said construction in 2014 and 2015 would concentrate on 13 new sidings, purchase and installation of automated train-control systems, crossing upgrades and new equipment.Lincoln Service passengers will switch to charter buses for eight days starting Aug. 16 to accommodate bridge and culvert work north of Bloomington, according to an announcement from Amtrak and IDOT. Amtrak spokesman Marc Magliari said, despite construction disruptions, more than 551,000 passengers took Lincoln Service trains through the first nine months of the federal fiscal year that started Oct. 1.The number is up 4 percent from the same nine-month period the previous fiscal year and on pace for a record. Amtrak has accommodated the steady increase by refurbishing and returning old passenger cars to service. The first new passenger cars are not scheduled for delivery until early 2016. “People have been more flexible in their schedules,” said Magliari. “We haven’t had any change to our capacity. It’s why we needed to get the additional cars.”The Midwest High Speed Rail Association also has begun lobbying for federal funding to expand capacity at Union Station in Chicago. Executive director Rick Harnish said Monday the station has become a passenger bottleneck, especially as Amtrak use continues to grow. “We need to figure out how to get some federal money flowing, so we can get moving on a lot of these things,” said Harnish. “They should be doing it now.”Tim Landis can be reached at 788-1536. Follow him at twitter.com/timlandisSJR.***High-speed price tagBreakdown of $1.45 billion in contracts for high-speed rail work in Illinois as of June 2013:* Track and structures: $726.3 million* Professional services (design, environmental studies, program management): $211.4 million* Cars and equipment: $211 million* Signal and communications upgrades: $183.9 million* Grade crossing approaches, bridges, fencing and related work: $61.6 million* Station upgrades: $40 million* Land acquisition: $16.3 millionSource: Ilinois Department of Transportation__._,_.___
Filed under: Amtrak, Passenger Rail Transportatio Policy, United States High Speed Rail
May 31, 2013 • 9:00 am 0
This is a very interesting story and much worth your time. Of course, it matters not a dime’s worth what experts, common sense, experience, and respect for human dignity may teach us, regular people have zero say in the nation’s transportation policy so not one mile of true European-style high speed rail will ever be built in the United States. The only people who have a seat at the table are the special interest groups representing commercial highway users, the auto industry and airlines. It is still a good read. You can see it all on the link below.
New high-speed rail lines are credited with sparking a real estate and housing boom, among other economic benefits, in smaller cities in China. Now experts are debating whether rail modernization can have the same effects in the U.S.
A study by researchers at the University of California-Los Angeles and China’s Tsinghua University found that by connecting “second tier” cities to global hubs, more people move to the smaller cities where housing costs are lower, creating a real-estate boom, among other unplanned benefits.In 2007 China built new, 185-miles-per-hour bullet train lines to connect Beijing, Shanghai and Guangzhou to nearby cities, some of the construction coinciding with the 2008 Beijing Olympic Games. Based on the real estate appreciation recorded between 2006 and 2010, the researchers estimated that when “market potential,” defined as access to goods, services and labor, is boosted 10 percent by a new bullet train line, housing prices rise 4.5 percent.
Researchers say high-speed rail could fuel U.S. real-estate, economic booms.
Filed under: International High Speed Rail, Passenger Rail Transportatio Policy, Regional USA Passenger Rail, United States High Speed Rail
April 23, 2013 • 11:25 am 0
As a wholly-owned subsidiary of the trucking and highway interests, do you think the Federal Railroad Administration wants high speed rail to operate in the USA? Case closed. Read a great post here.
FRA Not Cooperating on Acela-2 | Systemic Failure.
Filed under: Amtrak, International High Speed Rail, Passenger Rail Transportatio Policy, United States High Speed Rail
April 22, 2013 • 9:00 am 0
Disgrace for Wisconsin, nice job Oregon and Washington State. This is the “why” part of the fact that not one mile of true high speed rail will be built in the United States. It goes against the powerful corporate interests that oppose it and have all the political power.
Filed under: Amtrak, Passenger Rail Politics, United States High Speed Rail
Logan Nash
patlynch
Trains For America 
Your comments and opinions on the latest passenger rail happenings