Trains For America

More choices for better transportation

Passenger rail not great news for freight industry, speaker says | News | 2theadvocate.com — Baton Rouge, LA

Passenger rail not great news for freight industry, speaker says | News | 2theadvocate.com — Baton Rouge, LA.

The growth of passenger rail lines across the country may not come as great news to the freight industry, fearful of losing track space to people, a spokesman for a freight rail company said Monday.

“Our concern with passenger rail is if they’re on our-right-of-way, that displaces freight,” said Robert W. Turner, senior vice president of corporate relations with Union Pacific Corp.

Turner told the Baton Rouge Press Club that some of the freight most likely to be displaced would be the containers often seen stacked on rail cars. Those are containers that can be offloaded onto trucks, putting more freight on highways.

What growth of passenger lines? UP has successfully kept the Sunset at three-days-a-week operation with its demand of $750 million in upgrades. I will leave the rest of this lame argument to my very capable readers.

Filed under: Amtrak, Passenger Rail Transportatio Policy

Rendell Supports Shuster’s Plan to Privatize Amtrak’s NE Corridor | PoliticsPA

Rendell Supports Shuster’s Plan to Privatize Amtrak’s NE Corridor | PoliticsPA.

This week Republican Representatives Bill Shuster (PA-9) and John Mica (FL-7) unveiled their plan to allow private companies to bid on the Northeast corridor of Amtrak, which runs from Washington, D.C. to Boston.

Shuster’s plan has found an unlikely supporter in former Pennsylvania Governor Ed Rendell.

Rendell called into Shuster’s and Mica’s joint press conference and explained his support saying, “I’m not a critic of Amtrak. Far from it…But the only way you’re going to get that money to make this project a reality is you have the states, the federal government and private companies at the table.”

 

Filed under: Amtrak, Passenger Rail Politics, Passenger Rail Transportatio Policy, Regional USA Passenger Rail

RAILWAY AGE COMMENTARY: Mica/Shuster bill: Reagan-Gingrich-Bush rehash? – RailwayAge Magazine

RAILWAY AGE COMMENTARY: Mica/Shuster bill: Reagan-Gingrich-Bush rehash? – RailwayAge Magazine.

I am proud to say that Railway Age had about the same reaction as I had yesterday (cue gag reflex) but they gathered the energy to write a coherent response to a politically motivated, mean, outrageous, misrepresentation by a well-informed man who certainly knows better than the dribble he placed before an unwary press and public. Shame on John Mica! Thanks Railway Age for doing my job for me.

Here is a sample. Read the whole thing (you must!) at the link above.

Oh man, have the cowpies—excuse me, political rhetoric—hit the fan! Some of the language is comical. Some of it is a confusing cacophony. Some of it is shrill. Most of it is useless, because if history is any indication, such legislative schemes are not going to do anything except misinform and confuse the public, needlessly worry Amtrak’s hard-working employees and distract them from doing their jobs, and force Amtrak’s management to spend countless hours defending the railroad, instead of running it.

Filed under: Amtrak, Passenger Rail Politics, Passenger Rail Transportatio Policy, United States High Speed Rail

Mica proposal for northeast corridor

Here is the text of yesterday’s release concerning the enormously dishonest Republican proposal to “privatize” rail passenger service in the northeast corridor. It is a powerful indictment of this country that, as we approach the very real possibility of defaulting on our financial obligations, it is impossible to have a civil and intelligent discussion of a topic that ought to be of interest to all, transportation

It is noteworthy, or at least worth mention just for the yucks, that GOP misinformation specialists drag out the Sunset Limited’s supposed loses per-passenger-mile without mentioning the Union Pacific demand for $750 million to begin daily service.

Before somebody gets all over me, we all know this is not a serious proposal, but it so grievously offends against honesty that the well is poisoned. How can people of good will ever enter such a conversation?

Anybody remember when George W. Bush had Peter Pan ready to take over the “profitable” NEC?

Here is the crux of my despair. If this is the tone of discussion concerning Amtrak and high speed rail, what is the level of integrity in discussions concerning the federal debt ceiling? How can the United States of America face a grave fiscal situation when we cannot honestly discuss trains?

Oh well, here it is.

Washington, DC – A dramatic new direction that focuses on bringing competition to high-speed and intercity passenger rail service across the country was presented today during a national briefing by Committee leaders. The plan incorporates competitive bidding and private sector involvement to bring high-speed rail to the Northeast Corridor and improve intercity passenger rail service nationwide.

U.S. Rep. John L. Mica (R-FL), Chairman of the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee, and U.S. Rep. Bill Shuster (R-PA), Chairman of the Railroads, Pipelines and Hazardous Materials Subcommittee, presented their new direction for U.S. passenger rail service to national and state transportation officials and passenger rail stakeholders across the country, and enable their participation via webcast and teleconference. The Mica/Shuster initiative is called the “ Competition for Intercity Passenger Rail in America Act .”

“After 40 years of costly and wasteful Soviet-style operations under Amtrak, this proposal encourages private sector competition, investment and operations in U.S. passenger rail service,” Mica said. “Competition in high-speed and intercity passenger rail will cut taxpayer subsidies, improve service, and bring our nation into the 21 st century of passenger rail transportation.

“Our plan will create jobs by finally bringing real high-speed rail to the one region of the country where it makes the most sense – the Northeast Corridor – and do so in a dramatically shorter time than Amtrak’s 30-year plan, at a fraction of their proposed $117 billion cost,” Mica said.

“Amtrak has repeatedly bungled development and operations in the Northeast Corridor, and their new long-term, expensive plan to try to improve the corridor is simply unacceptable,” Mica continued. “The nation cannot afford to continue throwing money away on this highly subsidized, ineffective disaster.

“It is time for a new direction. Around the world, other nations and the private sector have successfully competed to develop high-speed and passenger rail service,” Mica said. “There is no reason we cannot do the same in our most densely populated and congested region. By giving the private sector the opportunity to bring its resources and expertise to the table, we can lower costs, increase efficiency, and improve high-speed and intercity passenger rail service across the country.”

The Mica/Shuster proposal will also give states greater control and authority over their intercity passenger rail services, currently operated by Amtrak. Ridership on state-supported routes has increased significantly over the last 15 years, and incentivizing private sector competition for rail services on these routes will ensure states and taxpayers get the best possible deal and the best possible service. The initiative will also open up other Amtrak long-distance money-losing routes to competition, allowing the private sector the opportunity to bid on any intercity route and potentially improve service.

“It is time to deregulate America’s passenger rail system, and give intercity passenger rail the same opportunity for success that the freight rail and commercial truck industry have benefited from” Shuster said. “ We must look for more effective and innovative approaches to providing modern and efficient passenger rail service by focusing on projects that make sense, leveraging private sector investment, increasing competition, and opening the door to public-private partnerships.

“Both around the world and right here in the United States we have seen that competition works,” Shuster continued. “When Virgin Rail began operating the West Coast Line in Britain, the company doubled the corridor’s ridership in six years and turned a profit. Here at home, in an open bid process, Veolia won over Amtrak for Florida’s Tri-Rail South commuter line at $97 million to Amtrak’s $162 million. Success and cost savings like this can happen here if we end the Amtrak monopoly on intercity passenger rail and open it to competition. Done right, what in the past has been a liability can become an asset, generating jobs, economic development, and value for hardworking taxpayers.”

Northeast Corridor Competition

The Mica/Shuster initiative will bring real high-speed rail to the nation’s Northeast Corridor (NEC) between Washington, DC, New York City and Boston. The NEC is the region of the country where high-speed rail offers the greatest chance of success and the most national benefits. The corridor is already owned almost in its entirety by Amtrak. It is the most densely populated and congested area of the United States, and has the essential transit connections necessary for a successful high-speed system. Unfortunately, Amtrak’s Acela currently averages only 83 mph between Washington and New York, and just 65 mph between New York and Boston. The Mica/Shuster initiative will:

End the Amtrak Monopoly

Separates the NEC from Amtrak, spinning it off as a separate business unit

Transfers the title for the NEC to US DOT, including all assets, property and trains

US DOT enters into 99-year lease with Northeast Corridor Executive Committee

Executive Committee manages NEC infrastructure and operations

Bring Private Sector Expertise and Financing to the Table

Requires a competitive bidding process for development of high-speed rail on the NEC

Allows private sector to recommend best PPP framework

Establishes performance standards for competitive bidding process:

Real high-speed rail on NEC – less than 2 hours between WDC and NYC

Double total intercity rail traffic on NEC

Highest level of private sector participation and financing

Lowest level of federal funding

Full implementation in 10 years or less

Winning bids selected by NEC Executive Committee

Protect the Public Interest

5-member NEC Executive Committee represents federal and state interests

All current commuter and freight operations on NEC are protected

The Time is Now

NEC high-speed rail in one-third of the time as Amtrak’s proposal, with firm deadlines

Within 20 months of enactment, the NEC will transition from Amtrak monopoly to PPP

Create and Protect Jobs

New jobs for rail construction and operations

New jobs associated with development around rail stations

Hiring preference to any displaced Amtrak employees

Intercity Passenger Rail Competition

Fifteen states around the country currently pay Amtrak to operate intercity passenger rail. Unlike the Northeast Corridor, most state-supported routes run on track owned by freight railroads. The Mica/Shuster proposal encourages private companies to compete on these state-supported intercity routes. Because these routes still require federal subsidy, and because they are operated by Amtrak, there is significant room for improvement in service quality and financial performance. The Mica/Shuster initiative will:

Create Competition and Improve Service

Promotes competition by encouraging states to initiate a competitive procurement process for a menu of services

Incentivizes competition by redirecting funds from Amtrak to state DOTs

Establishes an expert panel for recommending competitive best practices

Save Taxpayer Dollars

Allows states to keep money saved through competitive bid process

Saves federal taxpayer dollars by requiring a new allocation process in 2020 to reflect cost savings achieved through competition

Protect Freight Railroad Interests

Involves host freight railroads through market-driven access negotiations

Create and Protect Jobs

Requires states to maintain current levels of service

Creates private sector jobs

Provides hiring preference to any displaced Amtrak employees

Long-Distance Passenger Rail Competition

This initiative will finally allow for competition to Amtrak’s least successful lines in an effort to reduce federal subsidies and improve service. Amtrak’s long-distance routes are subsidized at an incredible $117.84 per passenger on average. For example, the Sunset Limited, traveling between New Orleans and Los Angeles, lost $407.92 per passenger in 2010. Amtrak’s failing long-distance routes need to be opened to competition to reduce the burden on taxpayers and improve service for the traveling public. The Mica/Shuster initiative will:

Create Competition and Improve Service

Promotes competition by allowing private sector operators to compete with Amtrak to operate long-distance routes

Requires winning bids to be selected based upon the lowest possible level of federal support

Allows private sector operators to make a profit, incentivizing improved service and ridership growth

Save Taxpayer Dollars

Mandates that operating subsidies for contracted long-distance services be lower than Amtrak subsidies

Protect Freight Railroad Interests

Involves host freight railroads through market-driven access negotiations

Create and Protect Jobs

Creates private sector jobs

Provides hiring preference to any displaced Amtrak employees

Click here for a press packet on the “ Competition for Intercity Passenger Rail in America Act .”

Click here for a section by section summary of the proposal.

The Committee expects to post complete legislative text later today at http://transportation.house.gov

NEWS RELEASE

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

Congressman John L. Mica, Chairman

2165 Rayburn H.O.B. Washington, D.C. 20515 202.225.9446 transportation.house.gov

Filed under: Amtrak, Passenger Rail Politics, Passenger Rail Transportatio Policy

Slaughter reaffirms desire for faster rail service – Times Union

U.S. Rep. Louise Slaughter said she will continue to seek 110 mph passenger rail service across upstate New York following Monday’s statement by the Empire State Passengers Association endorsing top speeds of 90 mph in the near term, backing the position of CSX Transportation, the tracks’ owner.

“I am continuing to push forward in my effort to bring a dedicated third track for high-speed passenger rail to Upstate New York that will bring passengers from Buffalo to Albany to New York City at a top speed of 110 mph,” said Slaughter.
Read more: http://www.timesunion.com/business/article/Slaughter-reaffirms-desire-for-faster-rail-service-1413908.php#ixzz1OkGMKkRy
 

Filed under: Amtrak, Passenger Rail Transportatio Policy, United States High Speed Rail

Blog Stats

  • 497,186 hits

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 2,430 other followers

wordpress stat

Top Clicks

  • None
June 2011
S M T W T F S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930  

Categories