Trains For America

More choices for better transportation

Taking Aim at Rail – Transportation Experts

So why, exactly, are federal rail programs so hated by Tea Party Republicans? Here is a generally balanced discussion. I particularly draw your attention to comments made by Bill Lind of the American Conservative Center for Public Transportation.

As a conservative with strong Tea Party sympathies, I think the main reason for many Tea Party folks’ anti-rail attitudes is a lack of information. For example:

o Many of them think the current highway dominance is a free market outcome. In fact, it reflects almost a century of government subsidies for highways while those same governments were taxing privately-owned passenger rail.

o Similarly, they believe both urban rail transit and intercity passenger trains are subsidized while highways pay for themselves. The real numbers show that highway user fees, including the gas tax, cover only 51% of highway costs while Amtrak covers 62% of its operating costs from revenues and many rail transit operations cover 50% or more of operating costs from fares.

Read on.

Taking Aim at Rail – Transportation Experts.

Filed under: Passenger Rail Politics

Blog Stats

  • 497,300 hits

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 2,430 other followers

The Most Popular Passenger Rail Stories on Trains for America

wordpress stat

Top Clicks

  • None
January 2011
S M T W T F S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031  

Categories