Trains For America

More choices for better transportation

Calgary-Edmonton link blasted

Memo to self: Don’t ever pick a fight with Andrew Coyne.

Coyne has unleashed a tremendous walloping on HSR supporters. I presume his objection is rational and specific to the Edmonton Calgary corridor and not against all high speed rail. Since he also goes off on the much more populous Quebec City-Windsor corridor, it’s hard to know for sure.

For one of such absolute certitude, Mr. Coyne certainly throws around a lot of numbers and a lot of derisive words. There may be something to his argument, but his extravagant use of hyperbole makes us wonder and note:

  • bonedoggle
  • insane
  • farce
  • impervious to reality
  • dreamers

Let’s see. It’s 179 miles between Edmonton and Calgary. The Edmonton metropolitan area has a population of just over 1 million. Calgary is a little bigger at 1.6 million. Coyen cites the proposed costs of construction.

The Alberta report, for example, put the cost of linking Calgary and Edmonton—at 300 km, barely a quarter the journey from Quebec City to Windsor—at anywhere from $3 billion, for a humble 125-miles-per-hour diesel upgrade, to $20 billion, for the 300 mph, magnetic levitation special.

$3 billion seems awfully high for what we now call “high performance rail.” Perhaps this includes buying land, but that just doesn’t fit. I do not believe that part of Alberta is especially mountainous, but I could be wrong. If there are tunnels, that brings the price up.

The absolute desperation of the argument put forward against the rail proposals tells me there is something else at work  It’s a good read if you really need to be brought down a peg or two.

Filed under: International High Speed Rail, Passenger Rail Transportatio Policy

3 Responses

  1. Mike says:

    I know Andrew Coyne. Really. Had a drink with him in Toronto on more than one occasion at various media parties. Lesson learned? Don’t ever believe he believes a thing he says. He’s just earning his paycheck as an attack-dog for the lunatic right. He’s only one shade away from making it up as he goes along. And he knows it.

  2. francois says:

    I think that time has come not to listen to this type of people anymore. they argue with fallacious and out-to-date arguments.

    As I like to say, in god we trust all others show data … there has been a thorough analysis on the economic benefits of a high speed rail in that corridor, and the results are in favor of *DOING* the project.



  3. MadPark says:

    @2 -The problem is that many voters/tax-payers/”citizens” DO believe these lunatics – Eternal Vigilance is required at all times.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

July 2009
« Jun   Aug »


%d bloggers like this: