Trains For America

More choices for better transportation

Boardman chimes in about difficulty of “true” high-speed rail

In the same vein as Pat’s post yesterday, Amtrak chief Joseph Boardman is, unsurprisingly, emphasizing incremental increases in rail speed rather than a focus on faster and more expensive “true” HSR. As much as I think that “European-style” projects such as California’s are important, Boardman’s idea that increased frequency and more modestly competitive speeds could make a big difference certainly rings true. From the Chicago Tribune:

“It’s really not about the speed. It’s about reduced travel times and more frequency,” he told the Illinois House Railroad Industry Committee. “The competitive advantage is with the train.”

Boardman said plans in the Midwest for trains traveling up to 110 m.p.h. on corridors stretching over nine states make more sense. He said the immediate focus must be on modernizing infrastructure to increase train speeds in the Chicago area that currently are as slow as 5 m.p.h. because of freight-train congestion and antiquated track and signaling equipment.

Getting up to even 40 m.p.h. on stretches between Chicago and cities less than 50 miles away, such as Joliet, would be a big improvement, Boardman said.

“One hundred and ten is double the national speed limit” of 55 m.p.h. on highways, noted Boardman, who was administrator of the Federal Railroad Administration during several years of the Bush administration.

While the 55mph highway comparison is a bit silly considering that most states have higher limits that people tend to exceed anyway, it’s true that you have to walk before you can run. Right now, we’re really just crawling. There’s no sense in stalling improvements to important corridors in the hope that we can leapfrog them in a couple of years. Pat’s definitely right on this one. There’s demand for passenger rail right now, and if we don’t fulfill it we will be missing a huge opportunity for sustainable transportation.

Filed under: Amtrak, United States High Speed Rail

2 Responses

  1. Mad Park says:

    Here’s an article from Slate which gives some historical perspective on the issues surrounding passenger train speed. Worth reading.
    http://www.slate.com/id/2218394

  2. JanetxJohnsonqm says:

    established website for sale

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

May 2009
S M T W T F S
« Apr   Jun »
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31  

Categories

%d bloggers like this: