Trains For America

More choices for better transportation

Someone call “Amtrak” Joe: Stimulus shafts rail

This past week saw lots of wrangling in Congress over the transportation stimulus bill. House Transpo Committee Chairmain James Oberstar had called for a 34/66 split between transit and highway spending, including $5 billion for Amtrak and intercity rail. Unfortunately, the proposal actually revealed by the House cuts back to the traditional 1 to 4 split, cutting intercity rail money to $1.1 billion, as opposed to the $30 billion for highways.

Environmental blog Grist did some muckraking, and obtained some interesting comments about where the directive to make this change came from:

Oberstar’s office says the cuts were the product of the House speaker’s office, the Senate majority leader, and the Obama transition team. “How those decisions were made, I don’t know,” Jim Berard, communications director for the Transportation and Infrastructure Committee, told Grist. “It’s disappointing that our recommendation was not accepted on the whole, but at the same time we got a good deal for transportation infrastructure and we want to keep the momentum going for this bill.”

Berard says that at this point it’s not likely transit advocates in Congress will make too big a deal out of the cuts. “We don’t want to get into a family squabble at this point. I think the imperative is to get a bill going and get it going fast, and get it enacted quickly,” he continued. “I think there’s a lot of arguments to be made for more funding in every category on there. So to slow the process down by lobbying for more money for one particular sector or another may not be productive.”

It’s not the end of the world. Some money is better than no money, and there’s surely more political squabbling to look forward to before we know what the final package will look like. And in 2009 we have opportunities like Kerry’s HSR bill and the 5-year transportation “highway bill” to look forward to.

It’s just that neglecting transportation options capable of reducing carbon emissions and foreign oil usage hardly seems like “change” to me.

Filed under: Amtrak, Passenger Rail Politics

4 Responses

  1. Allan says:

    The more things change – the more they remain the same …

  2. fpteditors says:

    One should point out: The stimulus money is NOT from road-fuel taxes. The beneficiaries of road building are private-profit companies (oil and auto). The beneficiaries of rail and transit investment are the general public and planet earth. They are clearly picking winners and losers. And, of course, they are in a big “hurry,” so there is no time for “squabbles.” Looks like the bank bailout, walks like the bank bail-out, quacks like the bank bailout. Is there no end to their hubris?

  3. Paul says:

    No “change” here – that is for sure!

    If we ever had a chance for rail it was with this new administration and it looks like it ain’t happening.

  4. Chris says:

    Meet the new boss….same as the old one

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

January 2009
S M T W T F S
« Dec   Feb »
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Categories

%d bloggers like this: