Trains For America

More choices for better transportation

DOT now taking private proposals for HSR corridors

Remember that part of this year’s Amtrak Reauthorization bill that mandated the government  look at private proposals creating high-speed service in the NEC and other federal HSR corridors? Well, in two press conferences yesterday at Penn Station and Washington DC’s Union Station, John Mica (R-FL), Mary Peters, and Michael Bloomberg announced that the DOT has officially started this process.

What does it mean? Not a whole lot right now. There’s nothing binding about the measure, the law only requires the DOT to take the proposals, any further moves would require another act of Congress, including, most importantly, funding. The Washington Post questions whether any organizations are going to put in the effort, considering the economic situation. It’s also a little bit unclear as to how any high-speed corridor would operate. Under Amtrak? The bidding company? Would it be subsidized? All of this would seem to depend on the nature of any given proposal and how Congress would implement it.

The Transport Politic points out the loose definition set for “high-speed” for these projects:

Proposals to be submitted will have to provide for the accomplishment of one or more of the following goals:

  • Northeast Corridor between Washington and New York must be completed in 2h or less.
  • All other eligible must have their current travel times reduced by at least 25%.

In other words, these goals would not result in many corridors in the production of high-speed rail. Travel times in almost all of the corridors listed above, even if reduced by 25%, would still be far too long. As a result, this request for proposals could provide better train service, but not necessarily great train service.

But as The Transport Politic later states, the rhetoric presented at the press conference envisions more ambitious ideas, such as maglev. Whether propoals fulfill these lofty goals, disappoint with modest speed increases, or materialize at all remains to be seen.

But hey, if Congress is looking for a good HSR plan to put money behind, how about the very tangible and doable Midwest HSR network?

Filed under: Uncategorized

8 Responses

  1. Toast2042 says:

    Maglev, seriously? Can we finally drop this boondggle gift to highway funding (in that the price tag always turns people against any kind of transit) and buy some proven and effective trains from Europe?
    It’s frustrating to see souch money go out the window in the last several months with nothing to show for it. And why does it take always take five years and a hundred million dollars just to complete a study on whether rail *might* be effective? It’s no wonder it gets ridiculed as a viable transportation option sometimes.

  2. Paul says:

    Does 2 hours have an exemption from the TSB weight requirements?

  3. Paul says:

    WHAT IS WRONG WITH THIS COUNTRY?

    – LETS GO~! WE ARE IN GREAT DEPRESSION 2 AND IT LOOKS LIKE THERE WILL BE NO MAJOR INVESTMENT IN PASSENGER RAIL EVEN WITH THE BEST PRESIDENT AND VP FOR THIS CAUSE.

    I GIVE UP AND WILL MOVE TO EUROPE IF I DO NOT HEAR SPECIFIC LARGE SCALE HIGH SPEED PASSENGER RAIL PROJECTS ANNOUNCED IN JANUARY!

  4. Allan says:

    Toast – Because in many cases, maglev is the superior technology. The costs to build are roughly the same but the cost to operate definitely favors maglev.

    Paul – Bon Voyage!

  5. toast2042 says:

    Allan – why is no one building maglev, then? Aren’t there like two active lines? Plus, I’m going to have to ask for a like on your assertion regarding rail vs. maglev capital outlay.

  6. toast2042 says:

    *link, not like

  7. Allan says:

    DENVER_ “.. For the I-70 corridor, the study will look at: .. electric or Maglev trains; diesel trains aren’t being considered because of the steep grades along I-70.”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Top Clicks

  • None
December 2008
S M T W T F S
« Nov   Jan »
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031  

Categories

%d bloggers like this: