Trains For America

More choices for better transportation

Cato Institute strikes again

From our fellow Americans out in the Pacific Ocean, a note on the latest objection from the Cato Institute. In the interest of fairness, Cato is strictly libertarian in philosophy. I often find myself in agreement with these fine intellectuals, however, they suffer from a severe distrust of all government and disdain for governmental services.

Understanding that they are usually 100% wrong on Amtrak and transportation, here is the latest. Warning: not for weak stomachs.

Rails Won’t Save America
By, 11/7/2008 8:34:49 AMThe Cato Institute has published Randal O’Toole’s carefully documented study, “Rails Won’t Save America,” about rail transit’s costs, emissions, and energy use. Following is the Executive Summary:

“Rising gas prices and concerns about greenhouse gases have stimulated calls to build more rail transit lines in urban areas, increase subsidies to Amtrak, and construct a large-scale intercity high-speed rail system. These megaprojects will cost hundreds of billions of dollars, but they won’t save energy or significantly reduce greenhouse gas emissions.


Filed under: Amtrak, Passenger Rail Transportatio Policy, Regional USA Passenger Rail

California HSR business plan

Interesting information contained herein includes highways that will not be built and long-term economic impact of California HSR. In a nutshell, this is what airlines and highway lobbyists will fight to the death.

Because I am somewhat of a fiscal conservative, let me suggest you tone down some of these estimates. All estimates are always wrong. Nonetheless, you can get a good snapshot.


California’s new high-speed train system will be an infrastructure project on the scale of the State Water Project, generating more than $1 billion in surplus revenues a year by 2030, reducing congestion and pollution, and returning nearly three times as much in value as the system will cost over the next 40 years.

Those are among the key findings of a new Business Plan for the state’s 800-mile network of trains operating up to 220 miles an hour and linking California’s major cities between San Diego in the south and San Francisco and Sacramento in the north.

“This Business Plan calculates high-speed trains will alleviate the need to spend nearly $100 billion to build about 3,000 miles of new freeway plus five airport runways and 90 departure gates over the next two decades,” said Judge Quentin Kopp, chairman of the board of the California High-Speed Rail Authority, which released the plan Friday. “A statewide high-speed train system will meet that same need for about half the cost.”

Kopp called the Business Plan a “snapshot in time” taken from thousands of hours of detailed analysis of the economic underpinnings of the high-speed train system.

The scale and the length of time it will take to construct the system demands continuous economic review and adjustment to identify long-term costs, ridership and economic impacts, which are dynamic in nature. Similarly, construction and materials, land acquisition, energy and even the transportation preferences of millions of Californians will evolve over future decades.

“Nevertheless, this Business Plan provides a credible, reasonable and experience-based estimate of the system’s current financial and economic outlook,” Kopp said.

“The passage of Proposition 1A this past week demonstrates to federal funding authorities and private investors that California will make the political, legislative and financial commitment to developing high speed rail, ” said Sasha Page, Vice President at Infrastructure Management Group and head of the Authority’s financial plan team.

One way financial experts measure the return on the state’s investment is to calculate the system’s “present value” at a future time and compare it to the cost. (“Present value” is a way to figure value adjusted over time, much like figuring compound interest.) Building the high-speed train system will create more than $150 billion in measurable “present value” benefits – nearly three times the present value of the train’s capital and operational costs over the next 40 years.

In addition to 160,000 construction jobs over the next two decades, high-speed trains will generate 320,000 permanent jobs by 2030, growing to 450,000 jobs in 2035, according to the Business Plan. The system will reduce the state’s reliance on fossil fuel by 12.7 million barrels of oil per year and eliminate 12 billion pounds of CO2 emissions a year. It will expand transportation capacity, provide a new option for intercity travel, and act as a catalyst to strengthen existing city centers by maintaining and improving accessibility.

While the Authority’s plan is to complete the entire system by 2030, the Business Plan is focused on the “backbone link” between Los Angeles/Anaheim and San Francisco, consistent with current environmental evaluation and project planning. That is the key segment for which detailed financial calculations have been completed.

The $33 billion cost of the backbone link through the Central Valley will be shared among the State of California, the federal government, local and regional governments and private sector investors. Under Proposition 1A, approved by California voters last Tuesday, $9 billion in state bonds to develop the system cannot be spent until matching federal, local and private funding is also secured. Operation and maintenance will be financed by users through paid fares.

The Business Plan calculates that passenger revenues for the backbone link between Los Angeles/Anaheim and San Francisco will exceed operating and maintenance costs.

Filed under: Passenger Rail Politics, Passenger Rail Transportatio Policy, Regional USA Passenger Rail, United States High Speed Rail

A little help from my friends .. an open thread on the new Obama administration, Amtrak, and transportation

I am beginning to write an essay on Amtrak, the Obama administration and transportation policy. There are some aspects of this which are obvious. Among those is restoration of the Sunset east of New Orleans and an substantial purchase of new equipment. 

What do you believe is most needed at Amtrak, and also for federal involvement in regional transportation. Make this an open thread and feel free to leave your comments. I will check in frequently.

Filed under: Amtrak, Passenger Rail Politics, Passenger Rail Transportatio Policy, Regional USA Passenger Rail, United States High Speed Rail

Blog Stats

  • 498,522 hits

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 2,430 other subscribers
wordpress stat

Top Clicks

  • None
November 2008