Trains For America

More choices for better transportation

Amtrak trying to expand Acela service

Via the Boston Globe, Amtrak CEO Alexander Kummant says that the company is looking to increase the number of cars run on its Acela trains. Unfortunately, Amtrak would need to buy new cars for the route, as the Acela can’t use the normal Amtrak stock (which aren’t exactly easily available anyway). What does this mean for passengers of this very crowded service? Well, possibly ticket surcharges to fund the purchase of new coaches from Bombardier.

“We’re out of capacity,” said Kummant. “Most people know that’s a pretty tough ticket” because seats are hard to find except at “way-off-peak” times.

The Acela’s top speed of 150 miles per hour is drawing travelers who want to avoid rising airfares and highway congestion in the Northeast. Acela ridership climbed 7.7 percent in the first 10 months of fiscal 2008, part of Amtrak’s 11 percent gain.

The trains now run with an engine at each end. While that step speeds turnarounds when the Acela finishes its route and then reverses direction, reconfiguring trains to add coaches would be “very difficult and very time consuming,” spokeswoman Karina Romero said. Amtrak also doesn’t have any spare Acela passenger cars, so extending the trains would require buying more custom-built coaches, she said.

Trains are “running full and the demand is there,” said David R. Johnson, deputy director of the National Association of Railroad Passengers consumer group. “They have been under pressure to act like a business, and this is how private business acts.”

Higher fares alone wouldn’t produce enough money to expand the Acela, for which Amtrak agreed to pay $800 million in 1996 for 20 trains and maintenance. Such a step would require more funding for Amtrak, a “political football” that has struggled for aid in President Bush’s administration, said Kummant.

So there you have it, supply and demand. It’s amazing how even very flawed high-speed trains like Acela can generate so much increased traffic.

Filed under: Amtrak, United States High Speed Rail, , ,

6 Responses

  1. Jerry H. Sullivan, P.E. (retired) says:

    All very well and good, but how about expanded service and equipment for those of us outside of the NEC. The NEC ought to be held seperate from the rest of Amtrak, if it is operated by Amtrak at all. The NEC is the black hole into which most of the Amtrak subsidy goes, so how about returning the Sunset Limited to Florida, the Pioneer to it’s route, the Three Rivers, the Broadway, the Floridian, and then talk about expanded Acela service.

  2. Dave Miller says:

    How about Amtrak for Nashville.Tennessee….

    We ” Can’t get there from here ”

    The nearest Amtrak station to Nashville, is 250 MILES away !!

  3. Allan says:

    I’m with you Jerry … Stop focusing on the NEC and pay attention to the rest of us!

  4. Allan says:

    Dave, the nearest Amtrak station to Nashville is Memphis … more like 210 miles but still, the point is valid.

    There has been a proposal to build a new line from Memphis to Bristol. It’s languishing in the bureaucracy some as there hasn’t been a meeting in a few years.

  5. How about returning the Floridian (I would like the name “South Wind” better) to most of it’s former route, and using this route.

    ATlanta/Montgomery – Macon – Cordele – Waycross(merge) – Jacksonville- Miami via East Coast of Florida.

    But I dream on, because CSX is dead set against anything south of
    Nashville. If it is scheduled correctly, the Nashivllle-Birmingham, etc. train might be a seperate, coach only, if timing is for a early AM departure southward from Nashville, like 7am. It ought to be possible then to get to Waycross in 12 hours — 40 years ago it took a lot less than that, and via Evansville, it was only 8.5 hours from Chicago to Nashville. What is wrong today?

  6. Allan says:

    Jerry, you’re highlighting a problem that many rail supporters either fail to recognize or don’t know about. This that Amtrak doesn’t own the tracks and therefore cannot just add routes … even if they were of a mind to do so.

    And I doubt that congress would approved funding for a massive project of laying rails.

    I just wonder how much Amtrak could expand under the current conditions. I suspect not much.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Top Clicks

  • None
August 2008


%d bloggers like this: